Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is a bit better than the LG Velvet's 87.1 global score. Even being the best we compare here, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is heavier and somewhat thicker than LG Velvet. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG Velvet. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Velvet, although it has a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution. LG Velvet has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit superior battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 4700mAh battery size. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better camera than LG Velvet, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos or video in low light environments, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.