Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is much better than Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 general score. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a incredibly older, extremely heavier and thicker cellphone than Motorola Edge 40. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 40 has a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with more display brightness and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better camera than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos and a smaller camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 40's memory capacity to install applications and games is just as good as the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little better battery duration than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.