Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having an 87.9 score against 83.4. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, we must highlight that it is also a way older, just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier phone. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the same screen pixels density and a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has more brightness.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4600mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.