Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 global score. Although it's the best device in this comparison, it must be noted that it is also way older, a lot heavier and a little bit thicker. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better screen pixels density, a little higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a really brighter display. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 4310mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and video in low light situations and a smaller sensor providing a worse image quality, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.