Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having a global score of 87.9 against 86.3. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is incredibly older, somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the same quantity of pixels per inch of display and the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has much more brightness.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality and a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a lot better video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has much more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.