Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's general score of 87.1. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a notably older, somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker device than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the same count of pixels in each display inch and a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has much more brightness. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller back camera sensor offering a way lower image quality and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.