Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is much better than the Moto G Power's score of 76.1. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version and Moto G Power has Android 11 version. Even though the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and Moto G Power were only released with a couple months difference, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is just a bit heavier but also just a little bit thinner than Moto G Power.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a slightly better screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bigger display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and a lot better video definition. The Moto G Power counts with more storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Moto G Power has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.