Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-12 | -- |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G60s's 79.9 overall score. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro construction is a little heavier but a little thinner than the Motorola Moto G60s.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto G60s, although it has a just a bit lower display density, a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Moto G60s has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G60s also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Moto G60s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Moto G60s has a little better battery life than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.