Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-12 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than Motorola Moto Z Force, with a overall score of 87.9 against 75.8. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's construction is newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it's thicker and noticeably heavier.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a lot worse display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen. Motorola Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.