Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Play's score of 77.4. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is noticeably newer, but way heavier and noticeably thicker than Moto Z2 Play. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Moto Z2 Play counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.