Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is a bit better than Motorola razr (2020)'s overall score of 87. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a heavier and thicker phone than the Motorola razr (2020). Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a brighter display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit bigger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit higher pixels density.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking pictures in low-light situations, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger sensor.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 68 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.