Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | -- |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a score of 87.9 against 79.2. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot more opaque screen and a bit smaller display.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much faster CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s battery duration is just as good as the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.