Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-12 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. Even though Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and the nubia Red Magic 3S were released only 7 months apart, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is a bit heavier but also just a little thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes clearer photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a larger sensor, faster video frame rates and a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.