Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's general score of 76.2. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S, although they were released with only 4 months difference. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should provide the user very similar operating system features.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit sharper display than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a little bit more pixels per inch in the display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and more brightness. Nubia Red Magic 5S's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a processing unit that's very similar to Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's processing unit, and although the nubia Red Magic 5S has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have a 64 mega-pixels back camera, a 0.59 inches sensor and the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with higher video frame rate.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.