Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-12 | -- |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the Galaxy A16 5G, getting a global score of 87.9 against 76.2. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14. Even being the best in this review, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than Galaxy A16 5G.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a same size display and the same brightness, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A16 5G has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A16 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4700mAh.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.