Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is much better than Galaxy A25 5G's global score of 79.9. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is incredibly older, just a bit thicker and heavier than the Galaxy A25 5G. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better performing processor than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy A25 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little brighter display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photography, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a much better video quality.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G has just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.