Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A31's 81.3 global score. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a somewhat heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than the Galaxy A31.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a little larger display. Galaxy A31 counts with a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a camera with much more mega-pixels, a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.