Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2022-04-22 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is much better than the Galaxy A33 5G's 77.8 overall score. Although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than the Galaxy A33 5G, it must be told that it is also older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Galaxy A33 5G has Android 12.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy A33 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a quite bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G features much more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A33 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.