Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-12 | -- |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.73 ounces | -- |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A34's 82.9 global score. These devices use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A34 has Android 13 version. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a quite larger display. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has more internal storage.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy A34, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality. The Galaxy A34 has just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.