Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is much better than Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a way older, a little thicker and just a little heavier phone than Galaxy A35 5G.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a bit higher pixel density, a little bit larger display, way more screen brightness and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A35 5G and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro both count with extremely similar memory capacity to install games and applications, they have equal internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy A35 5G features a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos, a lot better video quality and a way more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.