Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A41, having an 87.9 score against 81.7. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, it must be noted that it's also a somewhat thicker and a lot heavier device. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A41 has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A41 features a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy A41, because it has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a larger back camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A41, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.