Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A50's 83.8 overall score. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro construction is newer than the Galaxy A50's, although it's noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite larger display. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a much better 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has an 18 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.