Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A51's overall score of 85.5. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A51 has Android 11. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a somewhat thicker and much heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A51.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A51, because it has a way better video definition, a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and a lot more MP back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.