Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's 87.9 global score. Even when the Galaxy A51 5G and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro were released with only a couple months difference, the Galaxy A51 5G is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with some additional features.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a bit larger screen. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A51 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM.
Galaxy A51 5G has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a way higher video quality, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.