Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, having a overall score of 91.3 against 87.9. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone, and it is also lighter and just a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version, offering some additional features.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a little larger screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photos or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same sensor size and the same resolution back camera, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 4% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.