Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, having a overall score of 91.1 against 87.9. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a newer device, and it is also a little bit thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52s. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit worse screen density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 4% greater battery size.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same camera sensor size and a same resolution camera in the back, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.