Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-12 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. Although Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A70, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. These devices include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of them have a greater pixel count per screen inch, the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a screen with the same size. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70. They have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and video in low light environments, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A70 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.