Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, getting a 92.9 score against 87.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro were only released 2 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G UW. They have the same screen pixels density, a display of the same size and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a 0.59 inches sensor and the same resolution back camera, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a lot better video definition.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 4 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.