Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-12 | -- |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | -- |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G's 80.5 general score. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has Android 12 version.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a way better processing power than Galaxy A73 5G. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A73 5G. Both have a higher pixel amount per inch in the screen, a display of the same size, the same display brightness and an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels. Samsung Galaxy A73 5G counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A73 5G features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.