Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy F41's 85.2 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while Galaxy F41 has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body has the same thickness than the Galaxy F41, but it is somewhat heavier.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy F41. Both of them have 8 processing cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little larger display and a much brighter display.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back and a 0.59 inches sensor, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy F41 has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy F41 features greater battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.