Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's overall score of 87.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy F62 is a little bit thicker than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, it's just a little lighter and newer. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher number of cores. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little sharper display than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, a screen of the same size and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a much brighter display.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have a 64 mega pixels camera in the back and a 0.59 inches camera sensor, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.