Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-12 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is better than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, having a global score of 97.6 against 87.9. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10, counting with a couple additional features. The Galaxy Fold body is incredibly thinner but notably heavier than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and both of them were released only a few months apart.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a camera with a much better resolution, a lot better video quality and a lot bigger sensor. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.