Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2022-07-01 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy M13, getting an 87.9 score against 81.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Galaxy M13 has Android 12 version. Although it's the best phone we compare here, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is notably older, a bit thicker and heavier than Galaxy M13.
The Galaxy M13 features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy M13, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M13, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M13, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy M13 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.