Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-12 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy M40, having a score of 87.9 against 85. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's body is newer, but much heavier and thicker than the Galaxy M40. Both devices in this comparison use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better looking display than Galaxy M40, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger display. The Galaxy M40 features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M40 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M40. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy M40, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor, a lot better video quality and a much more MP camera.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a way better battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.