Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having an 87.9 score against 79.3. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a newer 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, providing you some additional features. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro construction is much newer, but thicker and noticeably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a greater processing power than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster). Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a much higher resolution back facing camera, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.