Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a a lot newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it is somewhat thicker and much heavier. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit more memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor and a much more MP back camera.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.