Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note3, having an 87.9 score against 77.7. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's body is newer than Samsung Galaxy Note3's, but it's just a little thicker and a lot heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger display, a little bit higher screen density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little better performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has more processing cores and 3 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a way more megapixels camera, a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality, a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.