Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, getting a overall score of 95.4 against 87.9. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and improved performance. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, but it is just a little heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a lot brighter display, a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro have extremely similar storage for applications and games, they have exactly the same internal memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has worse 24 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations, a way bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.