Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is better than Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 score. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a way heavier cellphone than Galaxy S5 Sport, but they have the same thickness.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better display pixel density. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 68% bigger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a bigger aperture for better low light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.