Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-12 | -- |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | -- |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S6 Active's general score of 80.9. These phones come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, providing a lot of extra features and better performance. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a heavier phone than the Galaxy S6 Active, but both of them have the same thickness.
The Galaxy S6 Active features a sharper display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher screen pixels density. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits CPU. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have a F1.9 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a camera in the back with much more MP, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a much larger camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.