Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. Although Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is somewhat heavier than Galaxy S7 Active, it's thinner and much newer. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more processing cores and 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and a lot more opaque display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better display pixels density. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an 18% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.