Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S8 Active's global score of 81.9. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner phone than Galaxy S8 Active, although it is a little heavier. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S8 Active features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a better pixel density. Galaxy S8 Active has a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features better battery duration than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has an 18 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.