Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S9's score of 83.3. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is much newer, but noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S9. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a better pixel amount in each inch of screen.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 400 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a much tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.