Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, with an 87.9 score against 78.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is an older and noticeably heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, but Xiaomi could make it just a little thinner anyway.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a sharper display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bigger display and a better pixels density. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover 5 features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting images and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a back camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.