Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a general score of 87.9 against 80.1. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's construction is way thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixels density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.