Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's overall score of 81. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's body is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although both were released with only 3 months difference.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger screen. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 16 percent greater battery size.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher resolution back camera, a much bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.