Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's overall score of 87.9. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides you some nice extra features. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro were only released 3 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is thinner and somewhat lighter.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little lower display pixel density, they both have a same size display.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs, a camera with lot more megapixels and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a really longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.