Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 global score. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11. Even being the best in our current comparison, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is an older, somewhat heavier and notably thicker cellphone than the Galaxy Z Flip 3.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a just a bit lower screen pixels density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, they both have a screen of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro have very similar storage for apps and games, both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a processor that's very similar to Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's CPU, and although the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has more RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.