Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, getting a 92.3 score against 87.9. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro were released only a few months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat lighter and thinner. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10, so it provides some additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, they both have a screen with the same size.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a much higher video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.