Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, having a general score of 94.6 against 87.9. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it offers some extra features. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro were released with only a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is incredibly heavier but extremely thinner than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a much more megapixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 4 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.